2 Chronicles 18:7 Meaning and Explanation
“And the king of Israel said unto Jehoshaphat, There is yet one man, by whom we may enquire of the LORD: but I hate him; for he never prophesied good unto me, but always evil: the same is Micaiah the son of Imla. And Jehoshaphat said, Let not the king say so.”
King James Version (KJV)
Read this verse in context with translation switching:
Read Full Chapter →Ahab reveals Micaiah, whom he hates for always prophesying trouble, but Jehoshaphat insists they consult him.
The Context of 2 Chronicles 18:7
Ahab identifies Micaiah as an unpopular but available prophet.
What Does 2 Chronicles 18:7 Mean?
Ahab reluctantly acknowledged there was one more prophet available—Micaiah son of Imlah—but expressed his contempt for him because Micaiah consistently delivered messages of judgment and calamity rather than encouragement. This pattern shows that true prophets often bring uncomfortable truths rather than popular reassurances.
Jehoshaphat wisely overruled Ahab's preference, insisting that Micaiah be consulted. This decision reflected good judgment: the very fact that Ahab disliked this prophet made him more likely to speak truthfully, since he had nothing to gain by appeasing the king.
2 Chronicles 18:7 in the Original Language
Imla (יִמְלָא), 'Imlah' — patronymic form meaning 'he will fulfill' or 'he will be full.'
Frequently Asked Questions About 2 Chronicles 18:7
What does 2 Chronicles 18:7 mean?
Ahab reveals Micaiah, whom he hates for always prophesying trouble, but Jehoshaphat insists they consult him.
What is the context of 2 Chronicles 18:7?
Ahab identifies Micaiah as an unpopular but available prophet.