- Starting price
- Free; voluntary support
- Free tier
- Yes
- Platforms
- Web · Mobile browser
- Developer
- Bar Above LLC
- Launched
- 2026
- Updated
- Aug 16, 2026
The verdict
My Shepherd can lower the friction between a question and opening Scripture, and the free anonymous path is welcome. It should be treated as an AI-generated study prompt, never God speaking, definitive interpretation, pastoral counsel, crisis care, or a safe place for confidential disclosure. Verify every verse in context, compare translations and trusted human teachers, avoid personal details, and wait for clear privacy, model-provider, retention, deletion, safety, and terms documentation before creating a lasting account history.
Try My Shepherd ↗Opens myshepherdapp.church
My Shepherd is a mobile-oriented Bible chatbot marketed as “WWJD meets ChatGPT.” A visitor asks a question, receives a prose answer with King James Version verse citations, and can continue through suggested follow-ups or deeper questions. Anonymous use is available; a magic-link account can synchronize conversation history across devices. The app also exposes topic browsing, reactions, public trending insights, and church-search or affiliation features.
The central promise needs careful translation. Marketing says its custom language model learned or was trained only on the King James Bible and answers straight from God’s Word rather than the internet or human opinion. A generative system still has a base model, instructions, retrieval design, software, evaluation choices, and developers. Bible citations can ground an answer, but they do not make the selection, synthesis, or interpretation identical with Scripture or free from human judgment.
The service is free, has no subscription, and promises no ads. It invites voluntary support through Stripe, with suggested amounts and custom gifts. The contribution flow says support is not tax-deductible and requires an account. Free access is a genuine strength for curious users, families, and church invitations; it also makes clear disclosure and age-appropriate safety more important because cost does not limit reach.
We researched the public marketing site, browser application, account, history, church-connect, trending, reaction, donation, and client-visible safety flows. We did not inspect the server model, send a crisis prompt, verify every generated citation, donate, or assess the accuracy of church listings. No privacy policy or terms link was visible on the marketing or app surface during review. The site says it does not sell data, but that sentence does not explain model processors, prompt retention, training, analytics, security, deletion, church-affiliation use, or legal rights.
✓ The good
- Free and ad-free promise - there is no subscription barrier or advertising feed around Bible questions
- Anonymous path - a visitor can ask without first handing over an email address
- Verse citations encourage checking - answers visibly point back to KJV passages rather than presenting only uncited prose
- Follow-up questions support exploration - users can move from a broad concern into more specific study
- Optional cross-device history - magic-link accounts preserve conversations for people who deliberately want that convenience
- Local church connection - search, nearby discovery, and affiliation can point digital questions toward embodied community
- A crisis-handling path is contemplated - client code indicates the builders considered a distinct safety response
✗ Watch out
- The theological claim is overstated - no generative model can prove that its synthesis is simply God’s Word without human interpretation
- No visible privacy policy - prompts, location, church affiliation, reactions, history, vendors, retention, training, and deletion are not governed publicly
- No visible service terms - age, acceptable use, warranty, crisis limitations, liability, donations, and account rules remain unclear
- KJV-only framing narrows understanding - archaic language and one translation tradition can create avoidable confusion
- Trending insights can change expectations - private spiritual questions should never become public or church-visible without explicit granular consent
- Location and affiliation increase sensitivity - ZIP code, nearby search coordinates, home church, and religious interests can reveal belief and community ties
- Youth marketing raises the safety bar - a general chatbot is not a substitute for a parent, safeguarding leader, pastor, clinician, or emergency service
Best for
- Adults seeking a free first set of KJV passages related to a general Bible question
- Users who understand that AI prose is commentary to verify, not revelation
- Churches testing a low-friction discussion starter with clear human follow-up
- People comfortable using the anonymous mode without sharing sensitive details
Avoid if
- You need confidential pastoral, mental-health, abuse, legal, medical, or crisis support
- You want an answer representing all Christian traditions or modern Bible translations
- You cannot evaluate citations, context, interpretation, or generated uncertainty yourself
- You require a published privacy policy, model disclosure, deletion schedule, or contractual data safeguards
What My Shepherd is
My Shepherd is a web-based conversational interface that uses Bible text and generated language to answer questions and recommend follow-ups. It is closer to an interactive study aid than a searchable concordance because it interprets and composes an answer rather than merely returning matching verses.
It is not Scripture itself, a pastor, an accountable church, a licensed counselor, a crisis line, or a comprehensive biblical research library. “Only the KJV” describes a product constraint or retrieval corpus; it does not establish how the underlying model was pretrained, what instructions shape output, or whether each conclusion follows from its cited text.
Why the Scripture-first interface feels safer than it necessarily is
Verse citations, simple follow-ups, and the absence of web links give My Shepherd a clean and spiritually focused experience. Compared with a general chatbot, there is less visible distraction and a clearer invitation to open the Bible.
That design can create automation bias: a confident paragraph surrounded by Bible references feels authoritative even when the passages are selective or applied outside context. Users should read the entire passage, inspect who is speaking and to whom, compare genre and covenant context, and discuss consequential conclusions with accountable human leaders.
KJV answers and follow-ups: useful discovery with interpretive limits
The chat responds in natural language, cites verses, and proposes related or deeper questions. This helps someone who does not know the terminology for a concordance search move toward relevant passages.
A citation is evidence, not a guarantee. Check that the wording exists, that the passage addresses the question, that poetry or narrative is not turned into a universal command, and that several references have not been blended into a conclusion none makes independently.
History, reactions, and trending insights: convenience changes privacy
Anonymous sessions can keep a limited local history, while signed-in conversations can be saved to the service for cross-device access. Users can react to material, and the app includes public trending or helpful-insight surfaces.
Religious questions can reveal relationships, sexuality, health, doubt, abuse, finances, or belief. The product should state exactly what becomes public, aggregated, visible to a church, or used for product improvement. Until then, assume a saved prompt may persist and write nothing you would not place in an ordinary support database.
Church connection and crisis routing: a bridge that needs guardrails
Church-search functions can use a ZIP code or nearby coordinates and let a member affiliate with a home church. A distinct crisis-response path appears in the application logic, showing awareness that spiritual questions sometimes involve immediate danger.
Neither feature makes the chatbot a care provider. Church records may be inaccurate or unfamiliar, and automated crisis detection can miss indirect language. In immediate danger contact local emergency services; in the United States or Canada call or text 988 for crisis support, and involve a trusted person who can remain physically present.
Pricing
Anonymous access
Free
Ask KJV-oriented Bible questions in the browser without creating an account. Avoid entering identifying, pastoral-care, health, legal, financial, safeguarding, or crisis details.
Account
Free
Magic-link sign-in adds synchronized history and church-linked capabilities. Email is required; ZIP and home church appear optional in the signup flow.
Voluntary support
$1–$500 custom
The product solicits support through Stripe with preset and custom amounts. The page states contributions are not tax-deductible and requires sign-in.
My Shepherd’s primary product is genuinely free: no trial clock, feature-priced subscription, or advertising model is disclosed. That makes it easy to evaluate without financial pressure.
Voluntary support is processed through Stripe and is expressly not tax-deductible. Users should distinguish support of a product from a gift to a registered charity or local church.
The monetary cost is zero, but data and trust remain costs. An email-linked history, church affiliation, location-assisted search, reactions, and spiritual prompts can form a meaningful profile even when the vendor never sells it.
Before supporting the service or creating an account, ask for the legal entity’s full contact details, privacy and terms, donation refund policy, model and hosting providers, security measures, prompt-retention period, and deletion process.
Where My Shepherd falls behind
Publish comprehensive privacy and terms. Cover prompts, history, local storage, accounts, ZIP and coordinates, church affiliation, reactions, insights, donations, providers, training, retention, deletion, security, age, and crisis limitations.
Replace absolute claims with accountable ones. Explain the source corpus, base model, retrieval, instructions, evaluation, denominational assumptions, known failures, and what “trained only on the KJV” technically means.
Make provenance inspectable. Link every quoted verse to its full chapter, distinguish quotation from generation, show why each passage was selected, and flag contested or low-confidence interpretations.
Add granular privacy controls. Keep chats private by default, require explicit opt-in before aggregation or public insights, separate church visibility, and provide in-product export and deletion.
Publish safety governance. State age expectations, parental controls, safeguarding escalation, crisis resources by region, test methodology, reporting, human review, and a clear prohibition on replacing professional care.
My Shepherd vs. Bible Answers AI vs. Got Questions vs. Logos
Bible Answers AI is the closest conversational comparison and has the same core challenge: generated synthesis must be checked against the cited text. Got Questions provides edited topical articles from a disclosed evangelical perspective; users may disagree with conclusions, but authorship and a stable page are easier to inspect than a fresh model answer.
Logos and Blue Letter Bible require more study skill but provide translations, commentaries, lexicons, cross-references, and source visibility. They help a user investigate rather than asking an opaque model to collapse the investigation into one response.
Choose My Shepherd for a quick, low-stakes route into relevant KJV passages. Choose a sourced library and accountable human teacher for doctrine, pastoral application, original-language claims, contested questions, or decisions that affect health, safety, relationships, money, or church discipline.
The bottom line
My Shepherd removes cost and login friction from asking Bible questions, cites KJV verses, remembers optional history, and tries to connect digital curiosity with a local church. Those are thoughtful product choices. Its public claims then go too far: an AI answer is not uncorrupted Scripture, and a KJV-only corpus does not remove interpretation or model behavior. The lack of visible privacy and service terms is especially consequential for spiritual prompts, location, affiliations, youth, and crisis-adjacent use. Ask anonymously, disclose nothing sensitive, open every passage, compare responsible sources, and let a trusted human shepherd—not a chatbot—carry pastoral authority.
Alternatives to My Shepherd
Bible Answers AIAnother conversational Bible-answer tool for users comparing citation quality and model transparency.
Got QuestionsA large edited question-and-answer library with a disclosed evangelical perspective and stable articles.
Logos Bible SoftwareA deep research environment for readers who want primary texts, commentaries, language tools, and traceable sources.
Blue Letter BibleA free Bible study platform with translations, lexicons, commentaries, and cross-reference tools.A local pastor or study leaderThe accountable choice when a question involves personal context, doctrine, care, safety, or a consequential decision.Frequently asked questions
Is My Shepherd really free?
Yes. The public product says it is free with no ads or subscription. It asks for optional, non-tax-deductible support processed through Stripe.
Is My Shepherd trained only on the King James Bible?
That is the vendor’s marketing claim. Public material does not explain the base model, retrieval, fine-tuning, system instructions, evaluation, or technical boundary well enough to independently verify what “only” means.
Do I need an account?
No for basic chat. An optional email magic-link account saves history across devices and supports additional features; ZIP code and home church appear optional.
Are My Shepherd’s answers the same as Scripture?
No. The cited KJV verses are Scripture quotations, while the prose that selects, connects, and applies them is generated interpretation. Read every passage in context.
Does My Shepherd keep chat history?
The application supports local anonymous history and server-synced history for signed-in users. Without a public privacy policy, exact retention, backup, training, staff access, and deletion rules are unclear.
Can My Shepherd replace a pastor or crisis counselor?
No. It cannot know your full situation, maintain pastoral accountability, guarantee crisis detection, or provide professional care. Seek immediate local help for danger and qualified human guidance for consequential needs.
Does My Shepherd have privacy and terms pages?
No visible privacy or terms links were found on the public marketing and app surfaces during this review. The claim that data is not sold does not answer the broader processing questions.
Sources & further reading
More AI Bible Apps
Faith: Scripture MeditationFaith turns a Bible passage or personal concern into a narrated meditation with Scripture, breathing and music—an inviting format whose undisclosed AI data path deserves more scrutiny than its local-storage promise suggests.
GamalielGamaliel pairs a Bible reader with free AI questions, source links, audience profiles and publicly inspectable theological prompts—an unusually transparent experiment whose deployed model, retention and store disclosures still require independent caution.
Agentic JesusAgentic Jesus is a proactive Claude-powered faith companion with Bible chat, adaptive devotionals, prayer memory, voice and follow-ups—and its unusually clear data map also shows why intimate spiritual AI needs firm human boundaries.
LumenologyLumenology combines a multi-translation Bible with cited AI research, interlinear data, historical commentary and passage tools in a clean workspace—but citations reduce risk rather than removing it, and every important claim still needs verification.
My BibleVerseMy BibleVerse turns an emotion or written concern into a suggested Bible passage, reflection and AI-written prayer, then saves the moment into a daily habit—but its costly weekly plan, intimate data processing and confident personalization claims require discernment.
ScOARA free, focused AI tool that translates an ordinary-life situation into several Scripture suggestions, explanations and practical steps—approachable and transparent about many limits, but undermined by a direct contradiction over whether guest queries leave the device.