- Starting price
- Free for one app, then $19.99/yr
- Free tier
- Yes
- Platforms
- iOS - Android - macOS - Browser extension
- Developer
- riedel.wtf apps S.L.
- Launched
- 2020
- Updated
- Jul 26, 2026
The verdict
one sec is the best-executed friction tool on the market and it is honest about being friction: it delays apps rather than blocking them, and nothing in it reports to a partner. Buy it if your problem is the unconscious thumb-tap. Do not buy it as recovery infrastructure, and not as a filter - it has an adult-content blocker, but that lives in a browser extension, not on your network.
Try one sec ↗Opens one-sec.app
Almost every product in this category runs on one of two mechanisms. Filters decide what your device is allowed to load. Accountability tools decide who finds out what you loaded. one sec does neither. It sits between your thumb and the app icon, plays a breathing animation for a few seconds, and then lets you in. That is the entire mechanism, and it is the only product reviewed on this site built on it.
The developer states the case plainly in the App Store listing: one sec "DELAYS access to distracting apps instead of blocking apps completely - that's an important difference psychologically." The bet is that compulsive phone use is mostly unconscious, and that a few seconds of forced awareness collapses a meaningful share of it. Open Instagram with one sec configured and you get a breathing exercise, a mirror view of your own face, a prompt asking why you are opening the app, or a short maths problem. Then a button appears. You may press it.
That last sentence is the whole review in miniature. one sec cannot stop you. There is no partner-held lockdown, no report landing in someone's inbox on Friday, no tamper alert. A determined user taps through in four seconds; a frustrated one deletes the app in twenty. The vendor knows this and does not pretend otherwise, which is more than several better-funded competitors manage.
It is also, unusually, a consumer app with a published research trail: a PNAS paper, a CHI 2024 paper, commissioned work for the Danish consumer authority and the German office for the protection of minors. That is a real distinction in a category full of unsourced percentages. It is also a vendor citing research on itself, co-authored by its own founder, and that study deserves reading rather than repeating.
✓ The good
- Mechanism is well-targeted - it intercepts the unconscious open, the part of phone use willpower handles worst, instead of arguing with a decision already made
- Genuinely free for one app forever - breathing interruption plus the Re-Intervention timer on a single app, no ads at any tier, so you can test whether friction works on you before paying
- A real published research trail - a February 2023 PNAS paper, a CHI 2024 ACM paper, and commissioned studies for the Danish Competition and Consumer Authority and the German BzKJ, all listed on one-sec.app/research
- Nine or more intervention types rather than one gimmick - 4-7-8 and box breathing, mirror view, emotion and intention logging, rotate-your-phone, maths problems and journaling, so the pause does not become its own reflex
- Re-Intervention is the smartest feature - it ejects you after a set interval, say five minutes, and makes you pass the intervention again to continue
- Clean privacy posture - intervention logic runs locally with no profiling or data selling, and only users who opt in to studies contribute data
- A lifetime purchase actually exists - $99.99 outright, worth naming in a category of mandatory subscriptions
✗ Watch out
- It is friction, not protection - the vendor's own framing is that one sec makes distracting apps "slightly more annoying," and a user who wants past it taps continue or uninstalls, with nobody notified
- No accountability partner in any form - no report, no ally, no third-party notification, so it cannot substitute for what Covenant Eyes or Ever Accountable exist to do
- Free tier covers exactly one app - the help centre confirms free is limited to one target app, so anyone with two problem apps is on the paid tier within a day
- Android trails iOS by disclosure and by design - the FAQ states Android development began a year after iOS, and Don't Get Lost notifications are marked iOS-only
- Android interception is structurally fragile - the Play listing discloses use of the Accessibility Service API, which is subject to OEM battery optimisation and can conflict with other accessibility apps
- Published prices do not agree - the FAQ prints EUR 14.99 per year, the help centre $19 per year, the US App Store $19.99: three annual figures across three vendor-controlled pages
Best for
- Adults whose problem is reflex, not resolve
- ADHD-adjacent attention leakage
- Anyone already sober on content but scrolling too much
- Privacy-conscious users who refuse monitoring
Avoid if
- Active pornography recovery
- Any court, employer or church mandate
- A teenager motivated to circumvent it
- Households needing an actual content filter
What one sec is
one sec inserts a short mandatory pause between tapping an app and the app opening. You choose the target apps - social media, games, video, dating, trading and adult content are the vendor's named cases - and what the pause consists of: 4-7-8 or box breathing, a mirror view of your own face, an emotion or intention log, a rotate-the-phone task, or a maths problem. Then a continue button appears and you go through.
It runs on iOS 15 and later, Android, macOS 14 and later, and as a browser extension for Chrome, Safari, Firefox and Edge that treats websites the same way. Re-Intervention ejects you from an app after a chosen interval; strict block sessions can bar one on a schedule. The listing states it is covered by US Patent 12,468,828 B2.
The only friction product in this corpus, and the distinction matters
Every other tool in this category removes a capability or adds a witness. Canopy decides what the network will serve. Covenant Eyes and Ever Accountable decide who sees the log. Tech Lockdown makes settings enforceably hard to reverse. one sec removes nothing and tells nobody. It taxes an action by a few seconds and lets the tax do the work.
The theory is self-nudging: you are pre-committing against your own autopilot rather than being restrained by an authority, so the pause does not provoke the reactance hard blocks reliably do. That is a real literature and one sec is a clean implementation. But the mechanism defines the ceiling exactly. Friction works on habit and fails on intent. Someone reaching for a phone out of boredom is a good candidate; someone in a compulsive spiral at 2am has already decided, and the breathing animation is a formality on the way. Sold to the second person, one sec is worse than nothing, because it looks like a solution.
The intervention library and Re-Intervention
Nine-plus intervention types is not padding, it answers the obvious failure mode: any single pause becomes automatic within a fortnight. Breathing is the default and the type the research used, but the mirror view - your own face mid-reach - and the intention prompt are the ones users describe as harder to blow past. Emotion logging is the only mechanism here producing insight rather than delay.
Re-Intervention is what separates one sec from cheaper imitators. Friction at the door does nothing about the forty minutes past the door. Set it to five minutes and the app closes on you at five minutes, and you must pass the intervention again to reopen it, turning a toll booth into a metered road. It is free on your one chosen app, which is genuinely generous.
Website coverage and the adult-content blocker
The browser extension is where one sec comes closest to the accountability category, and the part to read most carefully. It applies interruptions to websites across Chrome, Safari, Firefox and Edge, and includes an adult-content filter the help centre describes as soft mode free and enhanced strict mode behind pro. That is a real feature and it is not a network filter. It lives in a browser, on browsers you installed it on, under an operating system that lets you install another in thirty seconds.
The honest framing is friction applied to a second surface, not protection extended to it. Nothing here covers a different browser, an in-app webview, another device on the network, or a guest profile. A household that needs pornography blocked needs a DNS or router-level filter; a person in recovery needs someone informed.
Pricing
Free
Free
One app of your choice, with the breathing interruption and the Re-Intervention timer. No ads at any tier, which the vendor says is deliberate. Funded by pro subscriptions and lifetime unlocks; the FAQ states revenue comes from app sales, not data.
one sec pro (annual)
$19.99/year on the US App Store
Unlimited apps, all intervention types, website blocking, time tracking, strict block sessions, the enhanced adult-content blocker, and iOS-only Don't Get Lost notifications. One-week trial. The vendor's FAQ prints this as EUR 14.99/year and its help centre as $19/year; the App Store says $19.99. A 50 percent student discount is advertised.
one sec pro Lifetime
$99.99 one-time
Same features, bought outright. Against the $19.99 annual plan, $99.99 is 5.0 years to break even, assuming the annual price holds - the help centre notes the lifetime price has already risen since 2021.
Family and teams
Family $3.99/mo, $29.99/yr, $149.00 lifetime
Family prices appear as App Store in-app purchases; $149.00 against $29.99 annually is 4.97 years to break even. Team and school licences are advertised from 83 cents per user per month billed annually, with no published seat minimum.
The free tier is one app, and the vendor says so in its own help centre: a single target app, with breathing and Re-Intervention. That is enough to answer the only question worth answering before paying, which is whether friction works on you at all. It is not enough for anyone with an Instagram problem and a TikTok problem.
The annual price is printed three different ways on three vendor-controlled pages. The FAQ says EUR 3.99 monthly, EUR 14.99 yearly, EUR 99.99 lifetime. The help centre article on pro says $19 per year. The US App Store says one sec pro (1 Year) $19.99, and shows no individual monthly tier at all - the only monthly figure Apple lists is Family Plan (1 Month) $3.99. The FAQ notes prices differ by region, which explains a euro-dollar spread but not $19 against $19.99.
Lifetime is the tier worth arithmetic. $99.99 against $19.99 per year is 5.0 years to break even, and the help centre says the lifetime price has already risen since 2021. Defensible if friction will be permanent for you; not if you are testing a hypothesis about your own habits.
Note that a family plan here means shared licensing, not parental control. No parent-held configuration lock is documented anywhere in the vendor materials, which is the feature a family tier in this category normally implies.
Where one sec falls behind
On protection, categorically. There is no mode in which one sec prevents access to anything a motivated user wants. No partner-held password, no tamper-evident configuration, no uninstall alert, no report. Covenant Eyes and Ever Accountable exist because for some problems the effective ingredient is another person seeing the log, and one sec has built the opposite product. That is a boundary rather than a bug, and the failure mode is buying it for the wrong job.
On the headline research claim, which needs reading rather than repeating. The February 2023 PNAS paper, Directing smartphone use through the self-nudge app one sec by David Gruening, Frederik Riedel and Philipp Lorenz-Spreen, is real, peer-reviewed, and co-authored by the app's own founder. Its design is an opt-in observational field study of 280 existing users over six weeks with no control group. Its measure is app opening attempts: 36 percent were abandoned at the intervention, falling from 43 percent in week one to roughly 32 to 34 percent by weeks three to six, alongside 37 percent fewer attempts initiated. The 57 percent on the homepage is the compound of those two effects on openings. It is not minutes, not against a control, and it describes people who chose to install a friction app and kept it. The decay to the low thirties is the most useful number in the paper.
On the wording around that number. The research page says one sec "reduces app usage by 57%" and the FAQ says the studies show a "57% reduction in app usage on average." App usage and app openings are not the same quantity, and the study measured openings. The homepage also advertises roughly two more hours of sleep per week and 3,000 years of scrolling saved weekly, neither attributed to any of the seven publications listed. Credit for publishing the papers at all; scrutiny for compressing them into marketing arithmetic.
On Android, still. A gap the vendor discloses is still a gap the buyer pays for: a product built a year later, on a more fragile interception mechanism, with a pro feature iOS-only, at the same price.
On being a Christian product, which it is not and never claims to be. one sec is a secular productivity app from a Spanish-registered, German-founded studio, with no scripture, prayer or devotional content in it. It appears in this category because the adult-content blocker and the habit-interruption mechanism overlap with what people here want, not because it was built for them.
one sec vs. Clearspace vs. Covenant Eyes vs. Tech Lockdown
one sec and Clearspace are the two friction products, and the choice is mostly taste. Both interpose a pause before a chosen app opens; both let you through. one sec is older, larger by ratings volume, deeper in intervention variety, further along on Android, and the only one of the pair with a peer-reviewed paper and a lifetime purchase. Clearspace leans harder on session budgeting.
Against Covenant Eyes it is not a comparison at all, and that is worth saying bluntly. Covenant Eyes exists to put a report of your activity in front of a named ally. one sec exists to make you breathe. If the problem is pornography with a relapse history, one sec is a supplement at best and a decoy at worst, because it produces the feeling of having installed something.
Tech Lockdown is the third mechanism: enforced configuration you cannot casually undo, with DNS filtering and profile locks that make reversal a deliberate multi-step act. That is the right tool when the failure is a 2am decision rather than a daytime reflex, and the tool one sec is furthest from. A sensible stack is Tech Lockdown for what the device may reach, Covenant Eyes for who knows, and one sec for the reflex - the cheapest layer, and the one to add last.
The bottom line
one sec is a very good product with an unusually honest account of itself, sold into a category tempted to hear more than it says. The mechanism is friction: a few seconds of breathing between the thumb and the feed, no filter, no witness, no lock. Its own PNAS study - opt-in, 280 users, no control group, co-authored by the founder - reports 36 percent of opening attempts abandoned, settling from 43 percent in week one to the low thirties by week three. A real and modest result, honestly obtained. At $19.99 a year or $99.99 once, with a free tier that covers one app forever, it is easy to recommend for the unconscious scroll. It is not recovery software, not a content filter, and not accountability. Do not let the breathing animation stand in for any of the three.
Alternatives to one sec
Frequently asked questions
Does one sec block apps?
Mostly no, and that is the point. The default behaviour delays access with an interruption and then lets you through. Pro does include strict block sessions that bar an app on a schedule, but there is no partner-held lock and nothing stops you changing settings or deleting the app.
What does the free version actually include?
One app. The vendor's help centre states free is limited to a single target app, with the breathing exercise and Re-Intervention for it, and no ads at any tier. Anyone with two or three problem apps needs pro, listed at $19.99 per year in the US App Store.
Is the 57 percent reduction claim reliable?
It comes from a real peer-reviewed source and it needs context. The February 2023 PNAS paper studied 280 opt-in one sec users over six weeks with no control group, and the app's founder is a co-author. It reports 36 percent of opening attempts abandoned at the intervention and 37 percent fewer attempts initiated; 57 percent is the compound effect on openings, not on minutes. Abandonment falls from 43 percent in week one to roughly 32 to 34 percent by weeks three to six.
Is the Android version as good as the iOS version?
No, and the vendor says so. The FAQ states Android development began a year after iOS, with parity an ongoing goal, and Don't Get Lost notifications are iOS-only. Android also relies on the Accessibility Service API to detect target apps, which is subject to battery optimisation and can conflict with other accessibility apps. Test the free tier on your device first.
Can I use one sec for pornography accountability?
Not as your primary tool. The adult-content blocker has a soft mode free and an enhanced strict mode in pro, delivered through the browser extension - an interruption in one browser rather than a network filter, with nothing reported to anyone. If the problem is pornography with a relapse history, use Covenant Eyes for reporting or Tech Lockdown or Canopy for enforcement, and add one sec on top.
Who builds one sec and will it exist in five years?
Frederik Riedel built it for himself in 2020 during lockdown in Germany and uploaded it when it worked. It is no longer a one-person project: the about page names roughly fifteen people, including three iOS developers, one Android developer, a backend engineer, designers and a lead scientist, trading as riedel.wtf apps S.L., with riedel.wtf GmbH as the Play developer. Judged fairly, 1M+ Play installs, 23,235 App Store ratings and a July 2026 release on both stores make a healthier independent business than most here - but a lifetime purchase from a fifteen-person studio is a bet on that studio.
Sources & further reading
- one sec official site ↗
- one sec FAQ and published prices ↗
- one sec research page ↗
- one sec about page and team list ↗
- Help centre: what is included in one sec pro ↗
- Apple App Store listing and in-app purchase prices ↗
- Google Play listing ↗
- Gruening, Riedel and Lorenz-Spreen, PNAS 2023 (accepted manuscript PDF) ↗
