- Starting price
- Free
- Free tier
- Yes
- Platforms
- iPhone · iPad · Android · Apple silicon Mac · Vision Pro
- Developer
- GODS HANDS, Inc.
- Launched
- 2019 as BePerk; relaunched as theWell in 2024
- Updated
- Aug 2, 2026
The verdict
theWell is one of the most ambitious Christian social apps in this catalog, and its explanation of automated and human moderation is more specific than most competitors provide. It is also not ready to be called a safe sanctuary without qualification. Google users rate it poorly, harmful posts can still appear, public prayer requests can expose deeply sensitive information, and the January 2025 documents contradict themselves about minimum age and basic data collection while granting the company an extraordinarily broad perpetual license to user posts.
Try theWell ↗Opens thewell.space
theWell is a Christian social network built around a familiar modern feed. Users can watch and create short videos, post photos and timed stories, follow people, exchange direct messages, publish text posts called Doves, submit prayer requests and testimonies, join a daily discussion, and browse featured or recommended content. Profile controls can hide follower, following, like, comment, and view counts, and users can express identity with emojis. The stated goal is to reduce comparison and bullying while creating a God-honoring global community.
The product began in 2019 as BePerk, an anti-bullying social platform, then shifted toward an explicitly religious direction in 2023 and was relaunched as theWell in late 2024. That history explains the Android package name and some older links, but it also leaves documentation seams. Apple’s privacy link still points to the old BePerk domain, while the current site hosts January 2025 PDF policies. The terms retain conflicting template language about users being at least eighteen, at least eight with supervision, not under eight, and not under thirteen. Apple rates the interface 4+; Google rates it Teen. Those statements cannot all guide a parent at once.
Moderation is more concrete. theWell says inappropriate or non-edifying content is removed and publishes a detailed page about its Checkstep partnership. Uploaded text, images, audio, and video can be evaluated by a combination of automated providers, including AWS Rekognition, Unitary, SightEngine, OpenAI Moderation, and hash matching through Project Arachnid, with human review queues and escalation. Raw images and videos remain in theWell storage and can be retrieved for analysis on demand. This is a serious safety architecture; it reduces risk and processes user content. No classifier, reviewer, or Christian label can prevent every harmful post before someone sees it.
The store split is a useful warning. Apple users currently give about 4.1, while Google Play is around 2.5 from a similar number of reviews despite more than 50,000 installs. Android reviewers report crashes, loading and account problems, and content concerns. We treat those as reports, not universal experience, but a platform gap that large matters. This researched review uses the live stores, current official site, moderation explanation, and full January 2025 privacy and terms PDFs as of August 2, 2026. We did not publish or message through the current build.
✓ The good
- Christian identity is explicit - prayer, testimonies, Bible discussion, and Christ-centered community are core product concepts rather than user-created edge cases
- Broad social formats in one app - short video, photos, stories, Doves, direct messages, following, featured content, and live features support varied participation
- Pressure-reduction controls are thoughtful - users can hide follower, like, comment, and view counts instead of making every relationship a public score
- Prayer and testimony have dedicated spaces - faith conversation does not need to compete entirely with ordinary lifestyle content
- Moderation architecture is unusually transparent - the vendor names Checkstep, automated providers, hash matching, review queues, escalation, and reporting flows
- No current subscription wall - stores list the app as free without in-app purchases
- Active recent development - the rebrand and 2026 releases show ongoing investment rather than an abandoned social experiment
✗ Watch out
- Age rules are contradictory - the terms contain incompatible thresholds while Apple says 4+ and Google says Teen
- User-content license is exceptionally broad - public posts grant perpetual, irrevocable, transferable, commercial reuse rights including a user’s image and voice
- Privacy notice contradicts the product - it denies sensitive processing and several data categories that prayer posts, photos, video, location language, and store disclosures plainly implicate
- Android reception is poor - Google Play sits near 2.5 with recurring reports of crashes, loading, login, and content problems
- Christian moderation is not a safety guarantee - user-generated content can include sexual, harmful, manipulative, false, or doctrinally disputed material before or despite review
- Public prayer can expose people in crisis - global visibility, screenshots, inference, search, moderation access, and broad licensing make intimate disclosure risky
Best for
- Adults who want an explicitly Christian social feed and understand public-post tradeoffs
- Creators sharing nonconfidential encouragement, testimony, teaching clips, and ordinary life
- Believers who value prayer and testimony discovery beyond an existing local circle
- Users willing to report content, use privacy controls, and keep sensitive care elsewhere
Avoid if
- A child would join before the company publishes one coherent minimum-age and parental-consent rule
- You need confidential prayer, pastoral care, counseling, safeguarding, or emergency response
- You are unwilling to grant a broad perpetual reuse license to anything you post
- Android reliability or guaranteed protection from harmful user content is essential
What theWell is
theWell is a full user-generated social platform organized around an explicitly Christian identity. Its home experience includes discovery and following feeds, short-form video, photos, stories, profiles, private messaging, Doves, prayer requests, testimonies, daily prompts, and featured posts. Users create the majority of the value and the majority of the moderation burden.
It is not a private church directory or a pastor-led small-group tool. People can encounter strangers, creators, claims, requests, and recommended material across a global network. The vendor supplies product rules and moderation; it does not verify every speaker’s theology, identity, need, professional qualification, or intent.
Why hiding social counts is meaningful—and why the feed still shapes attention
theWell lets users hide followers, following, likes, comments, and views, replacing some status signals with a less exposed profile. That can reduce comparison, popularity pressure, and the temptation to judge a testimony by engagement. Dedicated prayer and testimony sections also make faith-oriented participation a first-class action instead of a hashtag layered onto a general network.
The app still has For You, Following, Featured, and Explore surfaces. Ranking, notifications, short-video pacing, creator incentives, and the expectation of response can shape time and emotion even when the number is hidden. A feed optimized for “edifying” content can still produce compulsive use or substitute remote inspiration for embodied church life. Turn off nonessential alerts, set a stopping cue, and notice whether the app leads to prayer and relationship or only more scrolling.
Doves, prayer requests, and testimonies need different privacy rules
Doves are written posts that can hold questions, advice, Bible verses, and everyday thoughts. Special sections separate prayer requests and testimonies so users can invite support and celebrate what they believe God has done. A daily Dove question gives the whole network a common prompt. Structurally, that is more purposeful than forcing every faith conversation into a short-video caption.
Prayer content is often more sensitive than ordinary social content. A request can reveal health, pregnancy, addiction, abuse, immigration, finances, conflict, location, a child’s identity, or another person’s story. Public global prayer is not confidential care. Share the minimum, remove identifying details, obtain permission for anyone else’s situation, never post evidence or allegations, and use a pastor, qualified professional, emergency service, or safeguarding route when the need requires action rather than reactions.
Short video, stories, profiles, and direct messages recreate familiar social risks
Users can publish and watch short videos across comedy, sermons, food, sport, Bible study, and memes; share profile photos and videos; create timed stories; follow people; and exchange direct messages. That breadth helps Christian creators reach people in familiar formats and makes the network feel alive beyond text-based devotionals.
The same formats bring impersonation, grooming, scams, doctrinal manipulation, parasocial attachment, harassment, sexual approaches, and off-platform migration risks. Disappearing stories can be captured, and a direct message is not verified pastoral care. Keep personal contact, location, school, schedule, finances, and children out of public profiles; block and report early; and do not send money or move to another platform solely because a stranger’s testimony sounds urgent.
Checkstep moderation is substantive, intrusive, and imperfect by design
theWell says Checkstep orchestrates automated classifiers, human review queues, priorities, escalation, policy enforcement, analytics, takedowns, and reporting. It names AWS Rekognition, Unitary, SightEngine, OpenAI Moderation, and other providers for text, image, audio, and video analysis. Project Arachnid hash matching can identify previously reported child sexual abuse material, and workflows can support NCMEC reporting. Raw media remains in theWell storage and can be pulled for analysis on demand.
This is stronger disclosure than a generic claim that “AI keeps you safe.” It also means a user should not understand Christian community as private from automated or human inspection. Classifiers have false positives and false negatives, metadata pointers still lead to raw content, review queues take time, and the terms reserve a right but not an obligation to monitor. Report harmful material, assume uploaded media is processed, and never use the platform as the sole barrier protecting a child.
Pricing
theWell app
$0
The current Apple and Google listings show a free download and no in-app purchases. Feed, posting, Doves, prayer requests, testimonies, follows, stories, and messages are presented as core access.
Advertising
No current paid ad product stated
The January 2025 terms include a template section saying advertiser technology was not supported “as for today.” That is not a permanent no-ads promise. Store labels and the live interface should be rechecked as the business model develops.
Donations or payment language
No current public tier
The privacy template mentions donations and payment processing through Apple, but the current App Store lists no purchases. Treat the clause as policy scope rather than evidence of a live product.
Real cost of public participation
Data, content rights, and attention
Posting gives the company a broad license under current terms, and viewing or uploading consumes data and exposes content to moderation systems. Free price does not make prayer, identity, or children’s media low-risk.
theWell is currently free on both major mobile stores. Apple lists no in-app purchases, and Google does not present a subscription tier. A user can therefore explore and participate without encountering the paywall common to dating, devotional, or creator-community apps.
The current policies contain signs of a broader template rather than a settled business model. The privacy notice refers to donations and Apple-handled payment information, while the terms discuss advertiser relationships and then say the technology is not supported at that time. Neither clause proves a current purchase or ad system. The live store and checkout, if one appears later, control.
A free social network still exchanges value. Users provide attention, behavior, relationships, posts, images, voice, testimony, prayer content, and moderation signals. The current terms grant the service an unrestricted, unlimited, irrevocable, perpetual, transferable, royalty-free, fully paid, worldwide license over contributions, including commercial and advertising use and sublicensing, while the user retains ownership. That legal cost is more important than a zero-dollar price.
Churches should not treat free access as a reason to direct minors or a whole congregation onto the platform. Review the age conflict, content license, privacy inconsistencies, moderation boundaries, administrator responsibility, and an offboarding plan first. A local community may achieve its goal with a smaller private channel that asks less of every member.
Where theWell falls behind
The age terms are unusable as written. One part says the service is intended for people at least eighteen and that under-eight users are not permitted; another says it is for people at least eight with direct supervision; the user representation says a person is not under thirteen. Apple says 4+ and Google says Teen. Until a corrected policy names one threshold and consent process, minors should not be onboarded.
The contribution license is far broader than ordinary users will expect from a prayer network. Current terms permit theWell to host, use, copy, reproduce, disclose, sell, resell, publish, broadcast, retitle, archive, cache, publicly display, reformat, translate, transmit, excerpt, distribute, and create derivatives from contributions for commercial, advertising, or other purposes, with rights to a user’s name, company, image, and voice. Even if the company never exercises the full scope, a user has agreed to it.
The privacy notice conflicts internally. It says sensitive information is not processed, yet prayer requests and testimonies can reveal health, religion, crisis, and family life. It describes phone number, possible precise geolocation, device data, social login, donations, and use patterns, then its California table marks identifiers, internet activity, geolocation, and audio or visual information as not collected. Apple and Google list personal and media categories. A clear data inventory is overdue.
App-store privacy links and labels need maintenance. Apple’s developer privacy link routes to the former BePerk site rather than the current theWell policy. Apple lists linked contact information, user content, identifiers, usage, and diagnostics, while Google says personal information, photos, videos, audio, and other categories may be collected and that photos or video and audio can be shared. Users must reconcile three documents themselves.
Moderation language is doctrinally vague. Terms can suspend content described as against Jesus Christ or the Christian community alongside sexual exploitation, hatred, violence, terrorism, self-harm, and other safety rules. A global Christian network needs a transparent policy distinguishing core safety enforcement, doctrinal disagreement, tradition-specific teaching, criticism, and harassment. “Non-edifying” is not a sufficiently reviewable boundary by itself.
Technical experience varies sharply. Apple’s 4.1 suggests many satisfied users, while Google’s roughly 2.5 includes recurring crashes, loading, login, performance, and unwanted-content reports. The current versions may improve individual failures, but leaders should test the exact platform and never require participation where a broken app would exclude someone from community.
theWell vs. Instagram vs. YouVersion and a private church community
Instagram has an enormous network, mature creator tools, and well-developed safety controls, but Christian content sits inside a general commercial recommendation system alongside everything else. theWell narrows the stated culture and gives prayer and testimony dedicated space. Its smaller scale, inconsistent documentation, and younger moderation operation are the tradeoffs for that focus.
YouVersion is primarily Bible reading, plans, audio, highlights, prayer, and selected friend activity. It is not trying to reproduce a full short-video creator network. For someone who wants Scripture habits with a limited social layer, that narrower purpose may be healthier and easier to understand. theWell is for discovery and expression, not a substitute for a mature study tool.
Flocknote, Church Center, a moderated church group, or Marco Polo starts with people already connected to a local organization or relationship. Those tools can provide clearer leadership, membership, safeguarding, and continuity, though they offer less global discovery. A church should prefer the narrowest channel that achieves its purpose. theWell can supplement local community for an adult; it should not become the local church itself.
The bottom line
theWell deserves credit for trying to build Christian social infrastructure rather than merely adding Bible quotes to a generic network, and its Checkstep explanation shows real investment in content safety. The app’s strongest ideas—hidden status counts, Doves, prayer, testimonies, and an explicitly Christian discovery space—will appeal to adults tired of a general feed. Its governance documents are currently the limiting feature. Conflicting age rules, a sweeping perpetual content license, an internally inconsistent privacy notice, stale store links, vague doctrinal moderation, and weak Android ratings prevent an unqualified safety recommendation. Adults can explore with restrained profiles and nonconfidential posts; parents and churches should wait for corrected policies before placing minors or sensitive care there.
Alternatives to theWell
YouVersion Bible AppBible reading, audio, plans, prayer, and a limited friend layer with far less open social discovery and creator content.
FlocknoteChurch-controlled email, text, lists, and member communication for an existing congregation rather than a global public feed.
Marco PoloPrivate asynchronous video among people who already know one another, with no public discovery feed or Christian content moderation.
ChurchomeDigital church content, prayer, groups, and pastoral pathways with a ministry-led structure rather than a broad creator network.InstagramA vastly larger general social network with mature features and safety systems, but no Christian-only mission or protection from unrelated recommendations.Frequently asked questions
What is theWell?
theWell is a free Christian social media app with short videos, photos, stories, follows, direct messages, text posts called Doves, prayer requests, testimonies, daily prompts, and featured or recommended feeds.
Is theWell free?
Yes. The current Apple and Google listings show a free download, and Apple lists no in-app purchases. The January 2025 policies contain payment and advertiser template language, so recheck the store if a future paid or ad model appears.
Is theWell safe for children?
We cannot recommend onboarding a minor under the current documents. The terms conflict between eighteen, eight with supervision, under-eight exclusion, and not-under-thirteen language; Apple says 4+ and Google says Teen. The vendor should publish one coherent rule first.
How does theWell moderate content?
theWell describes a Checkstep system combining automated providers, hash matching, human review queues, escalation, takedowns, and reporting across text, images, audio, and video. This is meaningful risk reduction, not a guarantee that every harmful post is caught before viewing.
Are prayer requests on theWell private?
Requests posted to the community should be treated as public user content, not confidential pastoral care. Avoid names and identifying details, get permission before sharing another person’s story, and use qualified private or emergency channels when action is needed.
Does theWell own the content I post?
The terms say users retain ownership, but they grant theWell an extremely broad, worldwide, perpetual, irrevocable, transferable, royalty-free license to use, change, publish, commercialize, and sublicense contributions, including a user’s image and voice. Post only what can tolerate that grant.
Why are theWell’s Apple and Google ratings so different?
Apple is currently about 4.1 while Google is around 2.5 from a similarly sized review set. Android reviews repeatedly mention crashes, loading, login, and content problems. Ratings are not controlled tests, but the platform gap is too large to ignore.
Sources & further reading
More Community & Communication Apps
Grow: Christian Social AppA free Christian social feed with devotionals, worship sharing, and unusually visible moderation controls—more focused than Instagram, but still public user-generated content with unresolved age and privacy documentation.Marco PoloMarco Polo makes private, asynchronous video conversation unusually natural for families, friends, and small groups—strong for relationship across schedules, but not a church-management system or a confidential pastoral-care channel.
FextFext turns one iPhone message into separate personal SMS conversations—fast and inexpensive for a known list, but without the consent, shared administration, and compliance machinery of a church messaging platform.
SubsplashThe all-in-one church platform megachurches keep choosing - fully custom-branded apps across phone, web, and TV that make a 5,000-member ministry feel like an Apple keynote.
Spoken GospelA reading plan that gives you a 3-minute spoken-word video on every chapter of the Bible - the rare Bible companion that actually changes how the page reads.
FioA genuinely useful Catholic audio home that pays creators more and combines podcasts, music, and audiobooks—much smaller than Spotify, but far more intentional about what Catholic listeners can discover.